<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pooh&#039;s Think &#187; Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poohsthink.com/category/knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poohsthink.com</link>
	<description>Virtual Wood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous Leaks &amp; Primary Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/anonymous-leaks-primary-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/anonymous-leaks-primary-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Some Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent article  for Slate,  Farhad Manjoo offers a critical look at WikiLeaks  through the lens of the release of Afghanistan war logs. Manjoo asks, &#8220;Is radical transparency compatible with total anonymity?&#8221;.  With total anonymity of sources, which means that even WikiLeaks does not know and cannot know the sources of the leaks it provides, WikiLeaks has <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/anonymous-leaks-primary-evidence/#more-981" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/anonymous-leaks-primary-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faith &amp; Reason, Part 6: The Nature of Knowledge, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/faith-reason-part-5-the-nature-of-knowledge-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/faith-reason-part-5-the-nature-of-knowledge-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the hopes of populating a conceptual domain that contrasts with &#8216;faith&#8217;, it would seem &#8211; on the face of it at least &#8211; that the search be well served by sticking close to those realities we refer to as &#8216;knowledge&#8217;. But &#8216;knowledge&#8217; is a word with a broad use; in addition to propositional knowledge <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/faith-reason-part-5-the-nature-of-knowledge-part-2/#more-540" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/faith-reason-part-5-the-nature-of-knowledge-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faith &amp; Reason, Part 5: The Nature of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/529/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/529/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith and reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith versus Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith vs Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new reformed epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plantinga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have tried Belief (Intro &#38; Part 1 and Part 2), Metaphor, and Narrative and have found nothing. The armchair exploration of these joints of nature have only reinforced the notion that there is only harmony between faith and reason. But before torturing, burning, shooting, and mutilating our philosophical armchair and moving on, we have <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/529/#more-529" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/529/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

