<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pooh&#039;s Think &#187; Morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poohsthink.com/category/morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poohsthink.com</link>
	<description>Virtual Wood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Responses to the &#8216;New Atheism&#8217;, Part 1: Ravi Zacharias &amp; Sam Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/893/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/893/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/893/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative Christian family member recently sent me Ravi Zacharias&#8217;s book The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists (2008) and asked that I offer a reply.  The following is my reply. _____ 1.  Introduction 1.1  The Author Ravi Zacharias, born in India and now a Canadian/American, is a well known &#8220;international&#8221; Christian <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/893/#more-893" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/893/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Recent Debate: Is the Catholic Church a force for good in the world?</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/a-recent-debate-is-the-catholic-church-a-force-for-good-in-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/a-recent-debate-is-the-catholic-church-a-force-for-good-in-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Fry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ &#8221;Speaking for the motion, Archbishop John Onaiyekan and Ann Widdecombe MP. Speaking against the motion, Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry.&#8221; To watch all five segments of the debate, go here.  I have embedded the second segment below (press &#8216;HQ&#8217; if you find pausing): The audience was polled before the event: 678 people thought the Catholic Church <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/a-recent-debate-is-the-catholic-church-a-force-for-good-in-the-world/#more-780" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/a-recent-debate-is-the-catholic-church-a-force-for-good-in-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analytic Outline of My Entries Related to Hitchens, Wilson, and the Movie Collision</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/analytic-outline-of-my-entries-related-to-hitchens-wilson-and-the-movie-collision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/analytic-outline-of-my-entries-related-to-hitchens-wilson-and-the-movie-collision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collision Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisionmovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Wilson Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens Wilson Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molly Worthen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral argument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The following is an index of links to entries I have made &#8211; ordered by date &#8211; related to Hitchens, Wilson, and the Collision Movie. The Moral Argument Series: Part 1    (February) In this entry I introduce the central argument between Hitchens and Wilson: the Moral Argument. According to Hitchens, morality is innate and <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/analytic-outline-of-my-entries-related-to-hitchens-wilson-and-the-movie-collision/#more-703" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/analytic-outline-of-my-entries-related-to-hitchens-wilson-and-the-movie-collision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Enlightenment, Part 5: Christopher Hitchens &amp; Douglas Wilson: The Collision Movie</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/christopher-hitchens-douglas-wilson-the-collision-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/christopher-hitchens-douglas-wilson-the-collision-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Contrarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisionmovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guay Raz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Douglas Wilson&#8217;s and Christopher Hitchens&#8217; involvement in the recent Christian booksellers&#8217; Expo and Wilson&#8217;s involvement in this years&#8217; conference with John Piper is a significant insertion of Wilson, and by association his Kirk of north Idaho, into the consciousness of broader evangelicalism. You can see Piper&#8217;s and Wilson&#8217;s public discussion of Wilson&#8217;s involvement with Hitchens <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/christopher-hitchens-douglas-wilson-the-collision-movie/#more-675" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/christopher-hitchens-douglas-wilson-the-collision-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evan Wilson &amp; the Big Haus</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/evan-wilson-the-big-haus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/evan-wilson-the-big-haus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I would not be able to say about his brother , Evan Wilson is a man of peace. I found refuge and hospitality years ago in a sub-cultural of Moscow, Idaho, ruled by Evan and known as the Big Haus.  Click here  for a recent introduction.  I guess that sometimes you do reap what you sow and you <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/evan-wilson-the-big-haus/#more-522" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/evan-wilson-the-big-haus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moral Argument, Part 5: Collision Movie</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/470/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/470/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisionmovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens Wilson Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Hitchens Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/470/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COLLISION &#8211; 13 min VIMEO Exclusive Sneak Peak from Collision Movie on Vimeo. This is apparently just the first 13 minutes of the soon to be released movie. Here is a transcript of an important section from about the five to seven minute mark:   Hitchens: I am impressed with Douglas for this reason: very <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/470/#more-470" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/470/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leithart, the Probe, and Nathan Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/leithart-the-probe-and-nathan-phelps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/leithart-the-probe-and-nathan-phelps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 03:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Peter Leithart is the Cambridge trained theologian of the Kirk, operating &#8216;out of bounds&#8217; as a PCA minister. Leithart now heads the New St. Andrew&#8217;s College&#8217;s new graduate program after performing for years as a foundational faculty member. I had mentored with Leithart the year or so previous to the launch of Pooh&#8217;s Think, <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/leithart-the-probe-and-nathan-phelps/#more-455" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/leithart-the-probe-and-nathan-phelps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moral Argument, Part 4: Immoral Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-4-immoral-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-4-immoral-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisionmovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god existence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens Wilson Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedaphilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post tramatic stress disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Moral Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Hitchens Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In continuation of my analysis of the debate between Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson, I argue that Wilson has adopted an attitude towards morality that is immoral.   Wilson makes clear in his introductory remarks that empathy and emotion play no role in grounding morality:  &#8220;If there is no God, then who cares?&#8221;  Without divine <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-4-immoral-defense/#more-372" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-4-immoral-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moral Argument, Part 3: Ethical Information</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-3-ethical-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-3-ethical-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisionmovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitchens and wilson debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens Wilson Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Moral Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Hitchens Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My summary of the debate between Wilson and Hitchens (Canon Press) can be found here.  My analysis follows in four parts, beginning with this entry. Here is the map of what is to come: 1) Part 3 &#8211; Ethical Information:  The question over humanity&#8217;s access to &#8220;ethical information&#8221; jeopardizes the continuation of the debate beyond <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-3-ethical-information/#more-342" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-3-ethical-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moral Argument, Part 2: Summary of Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metzler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.S. Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisionmovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens Wilson Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Saint Andrews College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New St. Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Moral Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Hitchens Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poohsthink.com/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking a fatalistic view that was at odds with his ostensibly cheery humanism, he used to say that “if you look in playgrounds, you see the little judge and the little burglar and the little murderer and the little banker.” He tried and failed to derive consolation from religion, and once had the following exchange <a href="http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-2/#more-273" class="more-link">Continue reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poohsthink.com/the-moral-argument-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

